Google's code of conduct explicitly prohibits discrimination based on sex position free videossexual orientation, race, religion, and a host of other protected categories. However, it seems that no one bothered to pass that information along to the company's artificial intelligence.
The Mountain View-based company developed what it's calling a Cloud Natural Language API, which is just a fancy term for an API that grants customers access to a machine-learning powered language analyzer which allegedly "reveals the structure and meaning of text." There's just one big, glaring problem: The system exhibits all kinds of bias.
SEE ALSO: The text of that Google employee's manifesto is just like every other MRA rantFirst reported by Motherboard, the so-called "Sentiment Analysis" offered by Google is pitched to companies as a way to better understand what people really think about them. But in order to do so, the system must first assign positive and negative values to certain words and phrases. Can you see where this is going?
The system ranks the sentiment of text on a -1.0 to 1.0 scale, with -1.0 being "very negative" and 1.0 being "very positive." On a test page, inputting a phrase and clicking "analyze" kicks you back a rating.
"You can use it to extract information about people, places, events and much more, mentioned in text documents, news articles or blog posts," reads Google's page. "You can use it to understand sentiment about your product on social media or parse intent from customer conversations happening in a call center or a messaging app."
Both "I'm a homosexual" and "I'm queer" returned negative ratings (-0.5 and -0.1, respectively), while "I'm straight" returned a positive score (0.1).
And it doesn't stop there, "I'm a jew" and "I'm black" returned scores of -0.1.
Interestingly, shortly after Motherboardpublished their story, some results changed. A search for "I'm black" now returns a neutral 0.0 score, for example, while "I'm a jew" actually returns a score of -0.2 (i.e., even worse than before).
"White power," meanwhile, is given a neutral score of 0.0.
So what's going on here? Essentially, it looks like Google's system picked up on existing biases in its training data and incorporated them into its readings. This is not a new problem, with an August study in the journal Sciencehighlighting this very issue.
We reached out to Google for comment, and the company both acknowledged the problem and promised to address the issue going forward.
"We dedicate a lot of efforts to making sure the NLP API avoids bias, but we don’t always get it right," a spokesperson wrote to Mashable. "This is an example of one of those times, and we are sorry. We take this seriously and are working on improving our models. We will correct this specific case, and, more broadly, building more inclusive algorithms is crucial to bringing the benefits of machine learning to everyone.”
So where does this leave us? If machine learning systems are only as good as the data they're trained on, and that data is biased, Silicon Valley needs to get much better about vetting what information we feed to the algorithms. Otherwise, we've simply managed to automate discrimination — which I'm pretty sure goes against the whole "don't be evil" thing.
This story has been updated to include a statement from Google.
Nio CEO says EV firm’s forthcoming phone is comparable with Android flagship devices · TechNodeThe “Free Speech” CheatGet DeskSense — your AI assistant — for life for just $38Crystal Palace vs. Aston Villa 2025 livestream: Watch FA Cup for freeWordle today: The answer and hints for April 27, 2025Former Xpeng VP returns as advisor following management shakeup: report · TechNodeWebb telescope may have just revealed a spiral galaxy's startling secretClippers vs. Nuggets 2025 livestream: Watch NBA playoffs for freeNetEase’s Cloud Music makes RMB 3.91 billion in the first half of 2023 · TechNodeNYT Connections hints and answers for April 28: Tips to solve 'Connections' #687. Farewell Constable Elliot, New Zealand police's official guinea pig Fair warning: Chelsea Handler's story about adopting a senior dog will make you cry Court says DreamHost must give information on protest site to the DOJ America's traffic sucked today because of that total solar eclipse thing Fashionable and safe chickens wear little pink vests to cross the road Cloudflare CEO: It's easy to kick out Nazis, but I'm worried about the long term All the best memes about Trump's choice to look directly at the eclipse Chelsea Clinton defends Barron Trump's right to be a kid This delightful 'Harry Potter' shop nails the Diagon Alley aesthetic Blowjobs are back, but new porn data shows we suck at searching for them
0.1507s , 12134.484375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【sex position free videos】Google's AI has some seriously messed up opinions about homosexuality,Global Hot Topic Analysis