国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【coi phim khiêu dam có t?i kh?ng】Facebook employees discuss 'f*cking with' developers in leaked internal chats

Source:Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor:explore Time:2025-07-03 02:53:47

Facebook's relationship with third-party developers has always had its ups and coi phim khiêu dam có t?i kh?ngdowns.

Thousands of pages of newly released internal Facebook documents — obtained by investigative reporter Duncan Campbell and published by NBC News — put a much finer point on it. The included chat logs paint a picture of a company that knew it was screwing over developers, a stance that caused at least some employees to lament how badly Facebook was "fucking with" the companies that relied on access to Facebook APIs and user data.

The documents originated from a lawsuit brought against Facebook by the startup Six4Three regarding the former's treatment of third-party apps. While under seal by California courts, UK courts compelled Six4Three's founder to hand over a laptop containing all the records. They were later leaked to the press.


You May Also Like

Previous reporting on these documents has shown that while Facebook positioned cutting off some third-parties' access to user data as being driven by privacy concerns, they were often actually about undercutting rivals.

The documents leaked on Wednesday make clear what at least some Facebook employees thought of this.

One such example came in October of 2013. Facebook's then head of developer products, Ilya Sukhar, was engaged in a spirited written debate with Facebook's then and current director of product management Edward O'Neil about "platform simplification" and the effort "to balance '[protecting] the graph' with helping developers."

And just what, exactly, does this mean? While it's difficult to read through all the corporate speak, a 2014 slide defines the "Protect the Graph" goal as, in part, the effort to "Limit data available to apps [remove friend APls, privatize high-value APls]."

Essentially, this is how Facebook internally described its effort to restrict what user data third-party apps were able to access. Which, it merits saying, is often a good thing.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Remember Cambridge Analytica?

Sukhar had some thoughts about all of this.

"I feel like Iam the only one with a principled stand here and you guys just want to get something done," wrote Sukhar. "I just spent the day talking to many dozens of devs that will get totally fucked by this and it won't even be for the right reason."

He wasn't the only one who thought so. Later in the same conversation, Douglas Purdy, who at the time was Facebook's director of product, told O'Neil that Sukhar's assessment was correct.

"[If] we don't support that, i agree with ilya that we are going to fucking with a lot of developers," wrote Purdy.

In an August conversation of the same year, Sukhar — who founded Parse, which was acquired by Facebook — explained to Parse cofounder Kevin Lacker an upcoming change to developers' access to Facebook data.

"They are making it so that apps can't see any of your friends that aren't also on the app," explained Sukhar. "Everyone's invitation flow is dead man walking."

Lacker knew what that meant. "Yeah it sounds fucked and like developers will hate us," he replied.

We reached out to Facebook for comment, but received no immediate response. Notably, Facebook insisted in a statement to Business Insider that "old documents have been taken out of context by someone with an agenda against Facebook."

SEE ALSO: Twitter's new ad policy prompts politicians to call out Facebook

This, of course, doesn't change what Facebook's own employees thought and put into writing.

Importantly, it bears repeating, reducing third-party developer access to Facebook users' data is good. These leaked internal messages, however, show just how much power Facebook had over those developers even way back in 2013 — and that the company wasn't afraid to fuck with them in its quest to dominate the internet.

Topics Cybersecurity Facebook Privacy Social Media

0.2928s , 8180.046875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【coi phim khiêu dam có t?i kh?ng】Facebook employees discuss 'f*cking with' developers in leaked internal chats,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 99久久精品国产片 | 99精品久久这里只有精品 | 99视频在线免费看 | 国产成本人| 丰满人妻无奈张开双腿av | 粉嫩虎白女流水粉色视频 | 91大神亚洲影视在线 | 成人区免费aⅴ片在线观看 成人日韩高清 | 97人妻免费线观看2025 | 午夜福利片在线观看 | 波多野结衣教师中文字幕 | 91国语精品自产拍在线观看一 | 天美传媒国产电视推荐 | 一区二区三区乱码在线 | 91九色成人| 午夜精品视频在线无码 | WWW国产亚洲精品久久久 | 午夜色福利 | 午夜亚洲aⅴ无码高潮片在线播放 | 午夜成人高清无码 | 99精品一区二区 | 高潮流白浆潮喷在线观看 | 丰满的少妇一区二区三区 | 91精品乱码一区 | 99精品无码视亚 | 91精品国产综合久久久久久68 | 国产69久久精品成人看小说 | 丰满少妇激情进入高清播放 | av午夜午夜快憣免 | av无码国产精品麻豆 | 成人欧美日韩在线观看 | 午夜成年大片一区二区在线 | 99福利影院 | 91麻豆精品国产一区色欲噜噜噜 | 97视频福利 | 午夜A级理论片左线播放 | 2025国产在线 | 99久久无码一区人妻A片蜜桃 | 91精品午夜国产在线观看 | 91精产品自偷自偷综合官网版下载 | 91久久青青青国产免费 |