国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【eroticism】Google's firing of James Damore was legally fine, federal agency rules

Source:Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor:hotspot Time:2025-07-03 03:49:40

A federal agency has found that Google was well within its legal rights to fire James Damore in 2017.

The eroticismcompany dismissed its former engineer after he wrote a paper arguing that woman aren't as biologically equipped for leadership roles as men. Damore filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board after his firing, but a newly released January memo from the agency sides with Google.

SEE ALSO: We need to change the way we talk about women in tech

As NLRB legal counsel Jayme L. Sophir wrote on Jan. 16: "While much of [Damore's] memorandum was likely protected, the statements regarding biological differences between the sexes were so harmful, discriminatory, and disruptive as to be unprotected."

In the 10-page memo that first surfaced publicly in August 2017, Damore took issue with what he saw as a left-leaning "monoculture" at Google that left little room for public consideration of conservative viewpoints. That's where Sophir's reference to much of the memo being "protected" is relevant.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

In Google's view, Damore crossed a line when he focused his writing on the biological differences between men and women. The NLRB letter acknowledges that he made an effort to "cloak" his more controversial points behind "'scientific' references and analysis" and "'not all women' disclaimers," but further notes that such hedging offers him no protection.

32_CA_205351_01_16_18_.pdf by mashablescribd on Scribd

Damore's "statements about immutable traits linked to sex—such as women’s heightened neuroticism and men’s prevalence at the top of the IQ distribution—were discriminatory and constituted sexual harassment," the letter reads.

The complaint might have gone differently if Google had been careless with the firing. But as Sophir's memo notes, Damore's boss and the human resources manager "prepared written talking points in advance" making it abundantly clear that his dismissal -- according to documentation Google provided -- was "based solely on the part of your post that generalizes and advances stereotypes about women versus men."

The NLRB letter also references a company-wide email sent out in the aftermath of Damore's dismissal that largely echoes the reasoning used to justify his firing. The agency ultimately recommended that the complaint be dismissed -- which it might have been, had it not been withdrawn in January.

We learned only recently that Damore is part of a class-action lawsuit alleging discrimination against white male conservatives in Google's hiring practices.


Featured Video For You
The hidden cost of a conveniently connected world

0.1647s , 10026.6328125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【eroticism】Google's firing of James Damore was legally fine, federal agency rules,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 91麻豆国产级在线 | 91久久愉拍愉拍国产一区调 | 成年人免费黄色 | 99久久精品国产一区二区三区 | av老司机色爱区综合 | 97在线免费视频观看 | 国产aⅴ无码精品一区二区 国产aⅴ无码精品一区二区三区 | 91无码人妻精品一区二区蜜桃 | 99国产成人综合久久精品 | 国产av无码福利精品成人久久 | 日韩av毛片免费无码 | wwxxx免费| 99精品久久这里只有精品 | 91成人午夜在线精品 | 91香蕉视| 午夜网站在线观看免费完整高清观 | 91麻豆产精品久 | 放荡的女老板bd | 午夜成人中文字幕一区二区三区 | 99国产这里只有精品视频播放 | 91久久无精品人妻又 | 国产91亚洲精品成人aa片p站 | 91精品午夜福利 | 97精品人妻 | 丰满迷人少妇 | 91av电影在线 | 午夜网页| 高清无码色色视频 | 91大神高清无码在线观看 | 国产aⅴ无码精品片免费看 国产aⅴ无码精品一品二区 | 91久久久久无码国产精品一区99 | 国产白丝jk被疯狂输出91 | av天堂午夜精品一区二 | 97人妻天天爽夜夜爽二区 | 国产ar免费视频男人的天堂 | 爆乳无码专区 | 91制片厂果冻传媒公司苏语棠 | 国产aⅴ无码片毛片一级一区2 | 8x视频在线| 国产99久9在线视频 国产99久久久国产精品免 | 国产爆乳无码一区二 |