国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【??? ? ??】ACLU warns that 'no replies' on Twitter could violate the constitution

Source：Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor：hotspot Time：2025-07-03 04:29:19

Trump was basically Obama's reply guy throughout the 2010s,??? ? ?? so it's only fitting that he won't be able to take advantage of a new Twitter feature intended to curb his own comment trolls...legally, at least.

Twitter is testing an ability that lets users limit who can reply to their tweets. If you're part of the test, you'll be able to determine whether everyone can reply (the norm and current default), if only people that you follow can reply, or if only people you tag in a tweet can reply. If you don't tag anyone and go with that last option, you're basically turning off all replies, period.

Reactions to the new feature have been mixed. Some people are praising it as a way to stop potential harassers from replying. Others are joking about the feature's elitism. And of course, still more have turned the "no replies" tweet into a meme already.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

One important take points out the constitutional and legal ramifications of the feature for public officials. The ACLU has issued a statement that public officials need to be careful about how they use the reply-limiting features, lest they violate the First Amendment.

As a general matter, Twitter’s investment in user controls is a good thing. But public officials would be violating the First Amendment if they were to use this tool to block speakers on any accounts they’ve opened up for public conversation in their roles as government actors. Nor should public officials use this tool to decide who can, or can't, reply to accounts they have opened up for requests for government assistance, which may be on the rise due to COVID-19.

For the past several years, courts have been grappling with whether a public figure blocking someone on Twitter constitutes a violation of their first amendment rights. Most notably, the Court of Appeals upheld a ruling in a lawsuit brought against President Trump, saying that he was not allowed to block people after they had offended or disagreed with him, because it impinged on their freedom to engage in political speech.

The ACLU apparently sees the "no replies" feature as an extension of the idea of blocking because it limits speech in what has effectively become a digital public square. So, the new test features might be valuable, but people in the public eye are going to have to be careful about how they use them.

Topics Social Media X/Twitter Politics

0.1782s , 9827.6875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【??? ? ??】ACLU warns that 'no replies' on Twitter could violate the constitution,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板： 乖宝真紧h太好c了h 闺蜜放荡h肉辣文御书屋姜 | 92看看福利1000集合集免费 | www黄色免费亚洲高清无码网站 | 成人亚洲欧美在线观看 | 91尤物视频在 | 草草视频免费在线观看 | 午夜免费福利观看 | 日韩AV无码一区二区三区不卡毛片 | 91桃色安卓版下载 | 午夜免费片| 高潮喷水在线观看com | 午夜伦情电午夜伦情电影8090动漫在线观看 | 午夜在线观看中文字幕 | av在线中文字幕不卡电 | 高清成人av在线不卡 | www.色婷婷.com| 97亚洲综合色成在线观看 | 91精品在线看 | 91羞羞无码一区二区三区 | 国产9色在线日韩 | 91中文有码在线观看 | 国产91小视频 | 韩国三级无 | 午夜寂寞影院 | 1区2区日韩欧美国产 | 国产aaa级高清黄色 国产aaa级一级毛片 | 91久久国产成人免费观看 | 91日韩xxx三级a | 97国产成人精品免费视频 | 国产AV无遮挡喷水喷白浆小说 | 白浆国产高潮一区二区三区 | 丰满大码的熟女在 | 午夜私人影院免费 | 午夜伦伦电影理论片大片在线 | 91网址在线观看 | 91久久精品在这里色伊人68 | 丰满少妇高潮惨叫正在播放 | av无码专区亚洲av麻豆 | 午夜男女很黄的视频 | 午夜内射高潮av网 | www天天干com|