国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【indian cute quick sex videos】DoorDash accused of charging iPhone users more than Android users in lawsuit

Source:Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor:fashion Time:2025-07-02 10:38:01

A class-action lawsuit against DoorDashis accusing the food delivery service of charging iPhone users more than customers who order via Android. It seems you could indian cute quick sex videosbe paying for that blue message bubblein ways you didn't even realise.

Filed in the U.S. District Court of Maryland, the case alleges that DoorDash engages in "deceptive, misleading, and fraudulent practices" by hiding unfair fees behind certain labels.

Specifically, some DoorDash orders include an "expanded range" fee, ostensibly applied when a restaurant is outside the customer's "normal delivery area." The lawsuit claims DoorDash charges this expanded range fee in a variety of situations where it is uncalled for. This includes sending orders to restaurant locations further away from the customer in order to "justify" charging the expanded range fee, as well as charging the fee to paid DashPass Program users to subsidise revenue lost under the subscription plan.


You May Also Like

Significantly, the class-action lawsuit also accuses DoorDash of charging the expanded range fee to iPhone users but not Android users, even when they make the same order, at the same time, to be delivered to the same location.

"[A]s tests indicate, DoorDash charges the expanded range fee on iPhone users more often than Android users and charges iPhone users more for 'delivering' (likely because studies reveal iPhone users earn more),'" the lawsuit states. "These tactics are simply money grabs."

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

The lawsuit also alleges that the app misleads customers into believing "normal delivery areas" are determined by geography, when in fact they are drawn according to how much a restaurant pays DoorDash.

SEE ALSO: Grubhub, DoorDash hit with lawsuit for 'deceptive and unfair' practices in Chicago

The suit contains a slew of other allegations as well, including claims that DoorDash's "city" fees mislead customers into believing the money is actually paid to the local government. The suit further claims that though DoorDash charges an optional "Express" fee of $3, the delivery service actually has no ability to hasten your order. This would mean paying DoorDash for expedited delivery may not get you fed any faster than if you just spent that $3 on a few extra sauce packets.

DoorDash denied the allegations in a statement to Mashable, and claimed that any discrepancy between pricing on different devices could potentially be due to gradual rollouts of new features.

"The claims put forward in the amended complaint are baseless and simply without merit," said a DoorDash spokesperson. "Our priority is to provide the best service possible and ensure there is clarity for consumers that allows them to make informed decisions. We ensure fees are disclosed throughout the customer experience, including on each restaurant storepage and before checkout. Building this trust is essential, and it’s why the majority of delivery orders on our platform are placed by return customers. We will continue to strive to make our platform work even better for customers, and will vigorously fight these allegations."


Related Stories
  • DoorDash data breach leaves important customer details exposed
  • DoorDash glitch results in hundreds of free food orders
  • Massive DoorDash hack exposes millions of customers' personal data
  • DoorDash will finally fix its controversial tipping structure
  • This is why DoorDash delivery workers usually prefer cash tips

This isn't the first time DoorDash's fee structure has come under judicial scrutiny. The company was previously the subject of a 2021 Chicago lawsuit, which alleged it used "bait-and-switch" tactics by initially displaying small delivery fees, then piling on additional costs at the end of an order. The suit also claimed DoorDash customers were misled about where their money was going, as "the customer 'tip' was used to subsidize DoorDash's own payment to its drivers," and the $1.50 "Chicago fee" went into DoorDash's pocket rather than to the city.

DoorDash further paid $2.5 million in 2020 to settle a D.C. lawsuitaccusing it of misleading customers as to where their tips actually went.

UPDATE: May. 23, 2023, 2:00 p.m. AEST This article has been updated with a statement from DoorDash.

Topics Apps & Software

0.5128s , 14208.1796875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【indian cute quick sex videos】DoorDash accused of charging iPhone users more than Android users in lawsuit,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 午夜精品久久久久久久91 | 97一区二区三区 | 91蜜桃精品国产自产在线 | 1区2区3区高清视频 1区2区3区国产av天堂 | 91人成亚洲高清在线观看 | 国产av毛片 | 91人妻精品无码一区二区三区 | 91国内精品久久久久免费影院 | 韩国午夜理论a三级在线观看 | 午夜免费视频 | 91久久无码精品国产久米体头版 | 成人app在线观看 | 91tv成人精品人妻 | 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品劲 | 成人国产亚洲 | 国产ol丝袜高跟在线观看不卡 | 国产ts在线视频免费 | 午夜三级理论在线观 | 91精品国语高清自产拍 | 91久久夜色精 | 99久久国产综合麻豆 | 99久热精品免费观看四虎 | 午夜福利精品短视频在线 | 一区二区不卡老阿姨 | 97国产无遮挡A片又黄又爽小说 | 午夜理论片yy8860y影院 | 成人免费观看在线视频 | 艹b视频在线观看 | 99热在线免费观看 | 91精品啪啪网站无需下载在线观看 | av无码一区二区二三区 | 91久久综合噜噜噜 | 91国内免费在线视频 | 国产91精品免费视频 | 91久久午夜无码 | 91午夜精品免费视频 | 91精品国产免费久久电影在线观看 | 福利视频网站一区二区三区 | 国产av无码专区亚洲版 | 91爱爱视频| 国产av乱码一区二区三区 |