国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【oru?lu porno izlemek orucu bozarm?】Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news

Source：Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor：knowledge Time：2025-07-02 06:05:42

Wikipedia,oru?lu porno izlemek orucu bozarm? the internet's crowd-sourced encyclopedia, has declared "fake news" on far-right site Breitbart, deeming the outlet an unreliable source for facts.

SEE ALSO: Milo Yiannopoulos' Facebook rant shows that de-platforming actually works

The decision, flagged by Motherboard, was declared on September 25, 2018 after an ongoing discussion amongst site administrators that concluded, "[Breitbart] should not be used, ever, as a reference for facts, due to its unreliability.

Scrolling through the debate is enlightening, seeing the various reaction from site admins to the nature of Breitbart, with some comparing it to the Daily Mail, the UK paper that was similarly demoted as an unreliable source in 2017.

You May Also Like

Support. If anything, it's even more unreliable than the Daily Mail, as they at least use trained journalists, whereas Breitbart is a fringe propaganda organization which lets its extreme partisan bias get in the way of howit reports things, and whetherit does so, just as Fox News does. It too should be deprecated, but let's start with Breitbart (and InfoWars). -- BullRangifer(talk) PingMe17:51, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

And:

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Support. I don't like the use of blanket bans, but Breitbart seems to satisfy the conditions that required the Daily Mail one - an obviously unreliable source, with a reputation for inaccurate stories, which a few users nonetheless insist on trying to use as if it were a reliable news source.

Some opposed the comparison, too, claiming the issue with the Daily Mail was about fabricated stories rather than unreliability and partisanship:

"I will support a ban for any news outlet if it is proven it is currently fabricating stories on a regular basis, but no evidence of fabrication has been presented in the proposal. The precedent established by The Daily Mailban simply does not apply in this case."

Breitbart isn't completely banned, though, as citations for the site will still be allowed in regards to opinion and commentary.

Motherboard also notes a similar August discussion surrounding Info Wars that was eventually closed citing the "Snowball clause," which states: "If an issue does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being accepted by a certain process, there's no need to run it through the entire process."

TL;DR, no one in their right mind would believe an Info Wars citation anyway so there's no need to ban it.

That President Trump has legitimized both sites did little to sway the Wikipedia decisions so it remains to be seen what this does for his own rallying cry of "fake news."

0.1473s , 8108.828125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【oru?lu porno izlemek orucu bozarm?】Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板： 白嫩无码人妻丰满熟妇啪啪区百度 | 丰满少妇被猛烈高清播放 | 91久久国产口精品久久久 | 白丝丝袜高跟国产在线视频 | 91国偷自产一区二区三区老熟女 | 午夜精品亚洲 | av在线不卡无码一区 | 91精品国产高清一区二区三蜜臀 | 999www成人免费视频 | 日韩av一级黄片 | 91精品国产乱码久久无码 | 天美传媒全集在线播放 | 99精品国产免费久久久久久下载 | 99视频免费播放 | 午夜爱爱免费视频体验区 | 国产超帅gaychina男同 | 成人自拍视频在线观看 | 福利国产视频 | 91精品手机国 | 午夜欧美精品久久久久久久久 | 99ri在线视频 | 99久久国产精品免费一区二区 | 91福利影院| 国产v无码专区亚洲v桃花庵 | 99久久国产宗和精品1上映 | 爆乳美女脱内衣18禁裸露网站 | ts人妖在线观看 | 午夜激情最 | 丰满人妻熟妇乱又精品视频 | 波多野结衣国产一区二区在线观看 | 丁香网址 | 91精品国产闺蜜国产在 | 97久久久免费观看 | 18女下面流水不遮图免费图 | 午夜理论片yy6080私人影院 | 亚洲精品mm1313 | 97人妻免费视频中文 | 91国内在线视频 | 午夜18视频在线观 | 韩国三级丰满40少妇高潮 | 午夜福利电影网站鲁片大全 |