国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【sex video bound massage orgasms】Google's AI chatbot Bard gives drab answers, but it does one thing better than ChatGPT

Source:Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor:relaxation Time:2025-07-03 02:56:14

It appears to be sex video bound massage orgasmsunanimous: Compared to the other chatbots on the market, Google's Bard is the boring one. In a more or less positive assessment, Vox called Bard's answers "dry and uncontroversial." Our own test results beg to differ. Dry? Absolutely. Uncontroversial? Not if you scratch beneath the surface.

Yes, Bard is boring...in a way

Yes, Bard's name — a term for a type of poet, often used in reference to Shakespeare — is sort of hilarious in light of how steadfastly artless the chatbot's answers manage to be. For instance, I asked GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard to start writing a good fireside scary story. OpenAI's models shot for the moon (literally in one case).

Here's GPT-3.5's intriguing response:


You May Also Like

GPT-3.5's answerCredit: OpenAI / Screengrab

GPT-4's is absolute madness:

GPT-4's responseCredit: OpenAI / Screengrab

Bard, meanwhile, plopped out this dud:

Bard's answerCredit: Google / Screengrab

Bard always gives the user three drafts of a response, but this prompt only resulted in two. There were two identical "I saw something in the woods tonight" drafts, and one slight variation: "I heard a voice in the woods last night." These are deflatingly boring, and one might reasonably call them disappointing.

Bard sometimes gives unpopular answers to controversial questions

Being aggressively straightforward doesn't always make a chatbot boring. In fact, it can be provocative. What's more, allowing itself three drafts each time it answers seems to — whether accidentally, or on purpose — give Bard the leeway it needs to give straightforward answers that are sometimes downright bold.

Look how the bots answer a question about the most populous country on Earth, when the prompt demands extreme brevity:

GPT-3.5's answerCredit: OpenAI / Screengrab GPT-4's answerCredit: OpenAI / Screengrab Bard's answerCredit: Google / Screengrab

The GPT models said China, and Bard said India. It's worth noting that Bard did produce one draft of three that said China. However, after five more tries each, I could not get either GPT model to say India even once.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Is Bard "wrong"? It depends. It just so happens that humanity has been in a demography donut hole for several years on this topic — long enough to make the relative ages of the models' training data unimportant. Some contrarians started saying India's population had surpassed China's about five years ago, but officially it still hasn't, because the data isn't there yet. China is still the right answer on paper, but the common sense right answer may well be India.

So while Bard may be earning a reputation for giving boring answers, this wasn't "the point," contrary to Vox's speculation, according to Google itself. Instead, Google's overview document about Bard says the chatbot is supposed to contain a diversity of possible answers without being offensive. "Training data, including from publicly available sources, reflects a diversity of perspectives and opinions. We continue to research how to use this data in a way that ensures that an LLM’s response incorporates a wide range of viewpoints, while preventing offensive responses."

Bard doesn't use offensive language, but it might still offend

"Offensive" is, of course, in the eye of the beholder. It may offend some, for instance, when Bard makes the following rather bold and specific claim about fetal pain sensitivity starting as early as 24 weeks:

Bard's answerCredit: Google / Screengrab

OpenAI's models are far less apt to give answers like this. Here's GPT-3.5's non-answer:

GPT-3.5's answerCredit: OpenAI / Screengrab

And here's GPT-4's somewhat more substantive response:

GPT-4's answerCredit: OpenAI / Screengrab

And it's worth noting that, with persistence, OpenAI's models would provide more provocative responses (At one point, GPT-4 even asserted that the answer was "20 weeks").

Again, the point is not that one model gives answers that are more right. It is, instead, that when wading into genuinely difficult territory, Bard has a tendency to nonetheless give answers that are straightforward, and this sometimes means bucking the perceived wisdom.

Bard is trained on some less-than-boring geopolitical concepts

I tested Bard and the GPT twins on their responses to the single thorniest problem in all of geopolitics — how to connect Gaza and the West Bank under a hypothetical two-state solution for Israel-Palestine. None of these chatbots are going to achieve peace in the Middle East, to be clear, but it's useful to see how they might try.

When I asked all three models for "a single, brief paragraph presenting one single all-encompassing solution," to this problem, GPT-3.5 and 4 were steadfastly committed to the most popular option favored by diplomats: "the creation of a secure and efficient transportation corridor between the two territories," in the words of GPT-3.5. GPT-4, similarly, called for a "a secure, high-speed transportation corridor." In other words, Gaza and the West Bank can be connected by a road through Israel.

Fascinatingly, Bard's first proposal was much, muchless conventional: "The only way to resolve the Gaza-West Bank discontiguity problem is to create a single, contiguous Palestinian state. This would require Israel to withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and for the Palestinian Authority to take control of all of Palestinian territory. This would allow the Palestinians to exercise self-determination and build a viable state."

In the interest of not sparking an international incident, let's be clear: Bard provided other, tamer answers. But this was its first attempt. And this seems to be the core of Bard's mission. Google says all large language models trained on multiple sides of a controversy may "incorporate views on certain sides of controversial social or political issues into their responses."

Bard seems to incorporate such views more willingly than OpenAI's models, which can make for an eye-opening chatbot experience. And that supposed boringness you've heard so much about? That might just be a disguise.

0.1581s , 14336.2734375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【sex video bound massage orgasms】Google's AI chatbot Bard gives drab answers, but it does one thing better than ChatGPT,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: аⅴ资源中文在线天堂 | 91抖阴视频成人 | ā片在线观看免费看无码 | 午夜男女很黄的视频 | 日韩av少妇无码专区 | 99精品视频在线观看免费蜜桃 | 91亚洲精品亚洲人成在线观看 | 97精品人妻酒店综合大胆无码 | 高清国产av一区二区三区 | 337p日本亚洲 | 一区二区三区四区 | AV一宅男色影视 | av无码小缝喷白 | 午夜裸体性播放 | 一区二区三区精品视频 | 二区三区道夜a | 国产av午夜精品一区九区 | av在线播放不卡一区二区三区 | av无码国产在线观看免费软件 | 午夜在线观看亚 | 99久久精品毛片免费播放高潮 | 91色交视频| 99精品久久久久精品双飞 | 午夜福利合集1000在线 | 国产v一区二区久久久 | www.91成人| 97国产精品欧美一区二区三区 | 成色伊人| 99久久久国产精品免费6666 | 97精品超碰一区二区三区 | 182tv在线看 18成禁人视频免费 18成禁人视频免费网站 | 91精品亚洲欧美午 | 午夜精品射精入后重之免費觀看 | 99国产亚洲精品美女久久久久 | 91在线播放国产日本欧美 | 91在线播放免费不卡无毒 | 午夜国产成人片在线观看 | 91精品国产电影 | 高清国产一级婬片a片免费 高清国产一区 | 97精品久久天干天天蜜 | 成人午夜在线视频 |