Literary Twitter is adik tidur cerita lucahall in a tizzy, and we couldn't be more delighted, because the burns are piping hot, and the subject of the controversy is novelist extraordinaire Jane Austen.
SEE ALSO: Here are the winners of the 2017 National Book AwardsOn Friday, the Washington Postran an essay about the fact that Jane Austen never married, despite the fact that marriage and courtship were her main subjects in books like Pride and Prejudiceand Emma. But the ~scandal~ really got going after the Post tweeted out the piece on Sunday.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Based on a cache of journals and letters, the author represents Austen as a woebegone "spinster" who somehow managed to write classics about love despite lacking experience in marriage herself. But as Twitter users pointed out, a writer does not need first-hand knowledge of a subject to write about it masterfully.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Fantasy and science fiction writers really took the objection to the next level, by applying the article's observation -- that Austen did not write about what she experienced -- to their own slightly more out-of-this-world work.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Others pointed out that, given Austen's life and work, she might not have felt *quite* the despair at being unmarried that the Post'sauthor suggests.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
And then there were the straight-up literary burns.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Woe to the person who dares f*ck with Jane Austen fans on Twitter.
Best vacuum deal: Get the Shark Clean and Empty cordless vacuum for $199Best free Python coursesGet the Soundcore by Anker Q20i headphones for just $40An influencer was disqualified from the NYC Marathon for bringing a filming crew onto the courseGet the Roborock Q8 Max+ robot vacuum and mop at its lowest price everHow to unblock Pornhub for freeBest free Python coursesHow to unblock porn for freeMartha on a Mantle: Where to find the best dealsCES 2025: X CEO Linda Yaccarino reacts to Meta's pivot to Community Notes Ad blocking usage is up more than 10 percent from last year This Fox News host's comment about Hillary Clinton has the internet in an uproar Ignorant muggles put another Harry Potter home up for sale Donald Trump is totally right, we need more 'Law & Order' The Hillary shimmy GIF that's perfect for when you're winning at life 27 media companies band together in an attempt to sell better ads Clinton, Trump, and your money: A personal Donald Trump identifies new cybersecurity threat: 400 Donald Trump is not deleting tweets, despite claims to the contrary This toy advert is taking on gender stereotypes and people love it
0.2025s , 9969.234375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【adik tidur cerita lucah】Enter to watch online.Twitter burns Washington Post for criticism of Jane Austen's love life,