国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【phim b? sex】Enter to watch online.Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news

Source: Editor:knowledge Time:2025-07-05 08:05:10

Wikipedia,phim b? sex the internet's crowd-sourced encyclopedia, has declared "fake news" on far-right site Breitbart, deeming the outlet an unreliable source for facts.

SEE ALSO: Milo Yiannopoulos' Facebook rant shows that de-platforming actually works

The decision, flagged by Motherboard, was declared on September 25, 2018 after an ongoing discussion amongst site administrators that concluded, "[Breitbart] should not be used, ever, as a reference for facts, due to its unreliability.

Scrolling through the debate is enlightening, seeing the various reaction from site admins to the nature of Breitbart, with some comparing it to the Daily Mail, the UK paper that was similarly demoted as an unreliable source in 2017.


You May Also Like

Support. If anything, it's even more unreliable than the Daily Mail, as they at least use trained journalists, whereas Breitbart is a fringe propaganda organization which lets its extreme partisan bias get in the way of howit reports things, and whetherit does so, just as Fox News does. It too should be deprecated, but let's start with Breitbart (and InfoWars). -- BullRangifer(talk) PingMe17:51, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

And:

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Support. I don't like the use of blanket bans, but Breitbart seems to satisfy the conditions that required the Daily Mail one - an obviously unreliable source, with a reputation for inaccurate stories, which a few users nonetheless insist on trying to use as if it were a reliable news source.

Some opposed the comparison, too, claiming the issue with the Daily Mail was about fabricated stories rather than unreliability and partisanship:

"I will support a ban for any news outlet if it is proven it is currently fabricating stories on a regular basis, but no evidence of fabrication has been presented in the proposal. The precedent established by The Daily Mailban simply does not apply in this case."

Breitbart isn't completely banned, though, as citations for the site will still be allowed in regards to opinion and commentary.

Motherboard also notes a similar August discussion surrounding Info Wars that was eventually closed citing the "Snowball clause," which states: "If an issue does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being accepted by a certain process, there's no need to run it through the entire process."

TL;DR, no one in their right mind would believe an Info Wars citation anyway so there's no need to ban it.

That President Trump has legitimized both sites did little to sway the Wikipedia decisions so it remains to be seen what this does for his own rallying cry of "fake news."

0.1595s , 8268.5546875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【phim b? sex】Enter to watch online.Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news,  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 91精品手机国产免费 | 日韩av免费无码一区二区三区 | 韩国三级日本三级在线观看 | 国产91最新欧美在线观看 | 成人黄色免费在线观看 | 韩国三级欧美三级国 | 午夜精品福利色噜 | 91蜜桃传媒精品久久久一区二区 | 丰满人妻一区二区三区53视频 | 东京热无码一区二区三区av | 91久久久精品无码一区二区 | a区在线观看 | 韩国三级中文字幕hd久久精品电影完整版在线播放 | 成人手机视频在线观看 | 91精品国产综合久久久久久久 | 99久久免费精品视香蕉蕉 | 97久久精品无码一区二区天美 | 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区99 | 99精品久久99久久久久 | 99精品国产自在现线10页 | av一本大道香蕉大在线 | 韩国三级中文字幕hd | 91午夜福利影院一区二区三 | 午夜欧美在线 | 国产av巨作无遮挡 | 97在线视频人妻无码男人三区免费在线播放天堂 | 91无码人妻丰满熟妇区五十路 | 宝贝乖把腿分大一点h欧阳凝 | gogo亚洲肉体艺术欣赏 | 91精品丝袜国产高 | 国产av无遮挡喷水白浆网站 | 91九色国产操逼无码视频 | 99国精产品品质溯源网 | 高清欧美三级国产 | av一区二区三区电影在线播放 | 午夜影城无码专区 | 91视频久久 | av一本久道久久 | 波多野结衣av一区二区全免费观 | 福利免费 | av亚欧洲日产国码无码 |