No,?? ?? you're not just imagining it. Speech recognition systems developed by the likes of Amazon, Apple, Google, IBM, and Microsoft all have higher error rates when transcribing speech from black people than when doing so for white people.
So finds a study published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, which notes that the increased prevalence of these systems in modern day life risks enshrining a new form of digital discrimination unless action is taken.
"Automated speech recognition (ASR) systems are now used in a variety of applications to convert spoken language to text, from virtual assistants, to closed captioning, to hands-free computing," wrote the study's authors. "Our results point to hurdles faced by African Americans in using increasingly widespread tools driven by speech recognition technology."
Researchers took 115 human-transcribed interviews — including conversations with 73 black speakers and 42 white speakers — and compared them to the versions produced by the tech giant's speech-recognition tools. They discovered an "average word error rate" of almost double (0.35) when the system transcribed black speakers as compared to when it transcribed white speakers (0.19)."
In other words, the systems worked noticeably worse for people of color.
This is far from the first time we've seen evidence of bias embedded in the supposed technology of tomorrow. In December of last year, a federal study once again confirmed that facial-recognition tech is a biased mess. In October of 2017, we saw that Google's text/sentiment-analysis tool exhibited signs of homophobia, racism, and antisemitism.
However, it's worth noting that with one quarter of U.S. adults claiming to have at least one smart speaker in their homes, the bias uncovered by today's study is likely affecting tens of millions (if not more) people right now.
SEE ALSO: Federal study confirms facial recognition is a biased mess
"With adoption of speech recognition systems likely to grow over time," the study authors continue, "we hope technology firms and other participants in this field foreground the equitable development of these important tools."
That'd sure be nice, wouldn't it?
Topics Amazon Google
Pixel 8 Pro has a new temperature sensor. Can it 'read' an overheated iPhone 15 Pro?iPhone 15 durability test is in: Did it shatter like the iPhone 15 Pro?Google Pixel 8, Pixel 8 Pro officially announced.Reddit removes the ability for some users to opt out of ad personalization'Loki' Season 2 review: How do you make Loki so boring?macOS Sonoma: How to share passwords—even NetflixHow a trip to Area 51 inspired 'The Creator's terrifying USS NOMADNew PS5 owners: Get a free game before Oct. 20Chris Parnell antiApple Music Favorites are a thing in iOS 17.1 The 11 best tweets of the week, including Spunch Bop, Dr. Steve Brule, and the Coniferous Gang A hacker tried to remotely poison a Florida city's water supply How to delete your Clubhouse account 'In & Of Itself's opening message made the whole thing click (for me) How to use your iPhone keyboard as a trackpad Reddit swoops in to resolve WallStreetBets moderator drama How to check your internet speed from a web browser Netflix's 'Crime Scene: Vanishing at the Cecil Hotel' review Wandavision: What to know about the Pietro paradox 8 small dating app alternatives to tinder
1.8169s , 9931.5234375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【?? ??】Enter to watch online.Speech recognition systems have higher error rates for black people, study finds,